Detection of tool in pipe

ABSTRACT

Methods and systems for determining whether a tool has been deployed below a drill pipe are provided. A downhole tool can measure various characteristics, which then can be analyzed to determine the likelihood of a tool having been deployed below the drill pipe. For example, density and porosity measurements can be affected by the presence of casing or drill pipe, and thus such measurements can provide an indication of whether the tool has been deployed below the drill pipe.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to, and hereby incorporates byreference herein, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/347,209, filed onMay 21, 2010.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates generally to the field of logging a borehole. Morespecifically, the invention relates to determining the appropriate timeand/or location to activate a tool conveyed downhole.

BACKGROUND

Downhole tools can be conveyed in multiple ways as they are lowered intothe borehole or while drilling the borehole. Traditional approaches arethe conveyance of the tool on wireline by lowering the tool on a cablethat also provides power to the tool and communication between the tooland the surface. Alternatively, the tool can be conveyed by slickline.In this case, the tool is lowered on a cable that is used solely toconvey the tool but does not provide power or communication. The toolfunctions in an autonomous way and has its own downhole power (typicallybatteries). Limited down communication can be achieved by acceleratingthe cable in a certain pattern. Tools can also be conveyed at the bottomof drill pipe (e.g., Tough Logging Conditions or “TLC”) if boreholeconditions do not allow the tool to reach the bottom of the hole. Thismay be of particular interest in highly deviated or horizontal wells,where gravity will not allow the tool to reach the bottom of the well.In this kind of logging the wireline is inside the drill pipe and thelogging therefore is very similar to traditional wireline logging.

Pushing tools down on a drill string may result in damage to the toolsas they are used to push past obstacles in the wellbore. The operationof TLC is expensive and often requires logging cable and a loggingtruck. An alternative method is to deploy the tool through drill pipe,letting it exit the drill pipe and latch it to the bottom of the drillpipe. Once this is done, the drill pipe is pulled out of the hole whilethe tool is logging and recording the data in its internal memory.

In drill pipe conveyed logging, there may be little or no communicationbetween the downhole tool and the surface. This poses several problems,many of which are due to the fact that the exact time at which thelogging tool is latched to the bottom of the drill pipe is not known. Inorder not to exhaust the battery too early, the power to the tool shouldonly be enabled once the tool is ready to log up.

Additional problems exist for pad density tools equipped with a caliperarm to eccentralize the pad and to measure the hole diameter or anysimilarly-equipped device with a caliper arm. These arms generally donot allow a tool to move down when they are open. If a tool is beingpushed down with the caliper arm open, it may get stuck and with enoughapplied force the arm will bend or break.

It may be desirable, therefore, for the caliper arm to be opened onlywhen the tool is ready to move up, which, in most cases, is a fewminutes after it has been deployed. In the absence of any communicationfrom the surface, it is not possible for the tool to detect whetherdeployment has been successful. According to conventional methods, theenabling of the tool power and opening of a caliper is generally basedon a timer. This timer is set just before the tool is lowered into thedrill pipe to be pumped down. The setting generally has to leave enoughtime to allow for the tool to be pumped down and deployed. As there canbe multiple delays in the deployment this time has to be set very long(i.e., building in excess time). If the deployment is quick then thereis a long wait after the deployment before the tool can start moving up.

Thus, needs in the art exist for systems and methods that address someof the deficiencies in conventional tools, such as some of thedeficiencies described above.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a tool within a drill pipe, according to anexample embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of a density tool deployed within a borehole,according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a graph plotting depth versus the count rates of theshort-spaced detector and the long-spaced detector, according to anexample embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a graph plotting depth versus long-spaced apparent density,short-spaced apparent density, and the compensated density (RHOB) whenthe tool is in casing or drill pipe, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 5 is a graph plotting the channel versus long-spaced energyspectrum in and out of the casing, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a graph plotting the channel versus short-spaced energyspectrum in and out of the casing, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 7 is a graph plotting the windows ratios W1/(W3+W4) for theshort-spaced and long-spaced detectors, according to an exampleembodiment.

FIG. 8 is a graph plotting depth versus the long-spaced and short-spacedapparent photoelectric factor (PEF), according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 9 is a diagram of a neutron tool, according to an exampleembodiment.

FIG. 10 is a graph plotting depth versus the count rates of the neardetectors and the far detector, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 11 is a graph plotting depth versus thermal neutron porosity (TNPH)and thermal alpha factor (TALP), according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 12 is a graph plotting depth versus an exemplary Near/Far thermalcount rate ratio and also an exemplary (Near Thermal)/(Near epithermal)count rate ratio, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 13 is a flow diagram of an auto-detect algorithm or method,according to an example embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Some embodiments will now be described with reference to the figures.Like elements in the various figures will be referenced with likenumbers for consistency. In the following description, numerous detailsare set forth to provide an understanding of various embodiments and/orfeatures. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the artthat some embodiments may be practiced without many of these details andthat numerous variations or modifications from the described embodimentsare possible. As used here, the terms “above” and “below”, “up” and“down”, “upper” and “lower”, “upwardly” and “downwardly”, and other liketerms indicating relative positions above or below a given point orelement are used in this description to more clearly describe certainembodiments. However, when applied to equipment and methods for use inwells that are deviated or horizontal, such terms may refer to a left toright, right to left, or diagonal relationship as appropriate.

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a tool 102 within a drill pipe, according to anexample embodiment. The example tool 102 is shown disposed within aninner housing or protective sleeve 104 and within an outer housing orspecial drill pipe 106. In an example embodiment, either or both of theprotective sleeve 104 and the special drill pipe 106 can be made fromsteel. In a particular embodiment, where both the protective sleeve 104and special drill pipe 106 are made from steel, the tool 102 can besurrounded by about 0.55 in of steel (cumulatively between theprotective sleeve 104 and special drill pipe 106). Other than iron, incertain embodiments, the materials making up the protective sleeve 104and special drill pipe 106 can include about 1% manganese and 1%chromium. The inner gap 108 between the tool 102 and the protectivesleeve 104, as well as the outer gap 110 between the (centralized)protective sleeve 104 and the special drill pipe 106 are filled withdrilling mud. The flow of drilling mud through these gaps can, inexample embodiments, assist in carrying the tool 102 downhole throughthe drill pipe until the protective sleeve 104 and tool 102 reach theend of the drill string. In certain embodiments, the special drill pipe106 may be different from ordinary drill pipe in that it is the lastjoint of drill pipe in the drill string. In certain embodiments, thespecial drill pipe 106 also can include some type of latching mechanism(not shown) for attaching to the tool 102 when the tool 102 is ejectedfrom the protective sleeve 104. In some embodiments, the special drillpipe 106 can comprise a material and configuration substantiallyidentical to or similar to the rest of the drill pipe, and may simply bethe final joint of the drill string. In other embodiments, the specialdrill pipe 106 can have a different configuration to better house thelatching mechanism. In various embodiments, the latching mechanism canarrest the motion of the tool 102 relative to the drill pipe, once thetool 102 is substantially exposed.

The foregoing description is just one embodiment of a drill pipecarrier. Other embodiments with different geometries and different metalalloys are possible, as may be recognized by one of ordinary skill inthe art having the benefit of the present disclosure. Considerations totake into account in selecting materials to use in the construction ofthe drill pipe carrier include minimizing erosion, minimizing orfighting corrosion, and extending fatigue life in high-dogleg boreholes.

While the tool 102 is disposed within the drill string (such as shown inFIG. 1), the presence of the large amount of steel around the tool 102can have a significant effect on the tool response, which may bedominated by the high attenuation of the steel and the effect of the mudinside the drill pipe. However, the tool 102 generally remains sensitiveto the surrounding borehole 214 and the formation 216. A largevariability in the response is possible because the tool 102 is notoriented. For example, in an embodiment where the tool 102 is a densitytool, the density pad 220 can point towards the borehole 214 or theformation 216.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of a density tool 212 (which can be the tool 102represented in FIG. 1) deployed within a borehole 214, according to anexample embodiment. In an example embodiment, above the section of thedensity tool 212 shown in FIG. 2, the tool string 237 carrying thedensity tool 212 is latched to the end of the drill string, as describedabove. As shown in FIG. 2, the density tool 212 is disposed within aborehole 214 of a formation 216. Additionally, the density tool 212includes a density pad 220, a long-spaced detector 222 and shield 224, ashort-spaced detector 226 and shield 228, and a gamma-ray source 230.These components can be identical to or similar to components used inconventional density tools, as may be recognized by one of ordinaryskill in the art having benefit of the present disclosure. The densitytool 212 also can have a caliper arm 232 hingedly connected to the toolvia a hinge 234, with mechanics for operating the caliper in a calipermechanical section 236.

As shown in FIG. 2, the caliper arm 232 can be in extended position,extended such that the caliper arm 232 makes contact with (or approachescontacting) the borehole 214 wall. The caliper hinge 234 additionallyallows the caliper to be in a recessed position (not shown) in which thecaliper can be generally in line with the axis of the tool. As discussedabove, it is desirable to have the caliper arm 232 extend from the toolaxis to the extended position after the tool has been ejected from theprotective sleeve 104 and deployed from the drill string (and thenlatched thereto). In some embodiments, it can be important that thecaliper not be deployed if the tool is still moving downward.

As discussed above, certain complications exist when attempting todeploy certain tools in the borehole 214, particularly due to theinability to know when the tool has reached the position (e.g., at theend of the drill pipe) where the tool is to be deployed. As will bediscussed in more detail below, using measurements in the tool string(such as, in example embodiments, measurements from a density tool 212)can allow the determination of whether the tool has been deployed fromthe drill string. In the particular example of the density tool 212 witha caliper, the density measurement can be used directly to determinewhether the tool finds itself inside the drill pipe. Alternatively,other measurements (neutron porosity, resistivity, sonic etc) can beused to make the detection.

In example embodiments, the use of the density measurement inconjunction with the opening of the density caliper can be attractivesince the measurements are collocated. As will be discussed in moredetail below, permission to open the caliper can be based on a votingsystem, in which some measurements can veto the opening. Once thecommand to open the caliper has been given, the caliper can startopening in certain embodiments. If at the end of the process of openingthe caliper, the measured diameter is below a predetermined value, thecaliper can be closed again in certain embodiments. A new attempt can bemade after a predetermined wait time. In example embodiments, a newattempt at opening the caliper will only be made when the measurementconditions are satisfied. The fact that the caliper can be opened andthat the tool is deployed can also be used to provide a signal to powerup all the tools in the string, if this has not already happened.

In certain embodiments, measurements made by a density tool 212, such asthe density tool 212 of FIG. 2, can be used to help determine whetherthe density tool 212 has been deployed from the drill string (andtherefore the caliper arm 232 can be extended), or whether instead thedensity tool 212 is still within the drill pipe (in which case thecaliper arm 232 should not be extended). Certain examples of thesignificance of these measurements made by a density tool 212 will nowbe described with reference to the following FIGS. 3-8.

In example embodiments, the measurement of the density tool 212 insidedrill pipe is similar to the situation of the tool inside casing, andthus an estimate of a response of a density tool 212 being within adrill pipe can be obtained by looking at the density tool 212 responsein casing. An example of the effect of casing is shown in FIG. 3, whichis a graph plotting depth versus the count rates of the short-spaceddetector 226 and the long-spaced detector 222, according to an exampleembodiment. As the tool enters the casing (e.g., shown by the line 338at approximately 165 ft of depth), the count rate line 340 correspondingto the short-spaced detector 226 (i.e., in certain embodiments, thedetector closer to the gamma-ray or x-ray source 230) drops sharply. Thecount rate line 342 corresponding to the long-spaced detector 222 dropsless significantly. It is understood that the count rates may need to becalibrated using a calibration reference in order to take into accountsource 230 strength differences and tool-to-tool response differences.

FIG. 4 is a graph plotting depth versus long-spaced apparent density444, short-spaced apparent density 446, and the compensated density(RHOB) 448 when the tool is in casing or drill pipe, according to anexample embodiment. As shown particularly by the section showing theeffect of the casing, all three density lines jump as the tool enterscasing or drill pipe. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the largest effectis seen on the short-spaced density. This can be due to the largerrelative change in count rate and the lower density sensitivity of theshort-spaced detector 226, i.e. a small change in the short-spaced countrate corresponds to a large change in the apparent density. Thelong-spaced density, which has a deeper depth of investigation, can beless affected, as shown in FIG. 4. The compensated density (RHOB) dropsto a lower value (overcompensation).

FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 show that there can be a significant effect of steelsurrounding the tool on the total count rates and the density answer.Although they change significantly, the count rates may not always givean unambiguous indication of whether the tool is in casing. Looking atthe apparent densities shows that entering into casing or drill pipe canlead to a sharp increase in the difference between the long-spaced andshort-spaced apparent densities. This will result in a large negativedeltaRho. As will be discussed herein, this fact can be exploited todetect whether the tool is inside drill pipe.

In example embodiments, the presence of iron around the tool also canhave a strong effect on the spectral shape. Absorption of low energygamma-rays in the iron can remove most of the low energy part of thespectrum. The effect of entering casing or drill pipe on the long-spacedand short-spaced spectra is shown in FIG. 5, which is a graph plottingthe channel versus long-spaced energy spectrum in 550 and out 552 of thecasing according to an example embodiment, and FIG. 6, which is a graphplotting the channel versus short-spaced energy spectrum in 654 and out656 of the casing according to an example embodiment. In both figures,the scales have been adjusted so that the spectra have a similar maximumheight to give a clearer picture of the difference in spectral shape.

The change in spectral shape can also be reflected in the ratio of thespectral window count rates. FIG. 7 is a graph plotting the windowsratios 758, 760 W1/(W3+W4) for the short-spaced 226 and long-spaceddetectors 222, according to an example embodiment. W1 represents the lowenergy window (soft radiation), W3 and W4 the high energy part of thespectrum (hard radiation). Low energy gamma-rays or x-rays are not verypenetrating and are often called soft radiation. Radiation with higherenergy is significantly more penetrating as is therefore called hardradiation. As can be seen in FIG. 7, a dramatic change in the windowsratios for both the short-spaced 226 and long-spaced detectors 222occurs in example embodiments when the tool goes from outside the casingto inside the casing.

FIG. 8 is a graph plotting depth versus the long-spaced 864 andshort-spaced 862 apparent photoelectric factor (PEF), according to anexample embodiment. The graph thus illustrates an example effect thecasing has on PEF. As the tool enters the casing there is a largeincrease in the measured PEF of the long-spaced 222 and short-spaceddetectors 226. In some embodiments, this is a direct consequence of thesuppression of low energy gamma-rays in the casing or drill pipe.

The majority of the foregoing description and figures address the effectof casing or drill pipe on measurements made by an example density tool212. In some embodiments, other or additional approaches can be used fordetermining the presence of a tool inside casing or drill pipe. In onesuch embodiment, the determination of density, PEF, and borehole 214parameters like borehole 214 fluid density, presence of barite,standoff, and the like can be based on a forward model based on multiplespectral windows. An example density tool 212 for making thesemeasurements can be the PLATFORM EXPRESS density tool of the assignee ofthe present application. An inversion of the forward model can give anindication of the presence of the tool in drill pipe.

In a first example, the presence of drill pipe can be inferred from thereconstruction error when solving for the quantities above when using amodel valid for open hole only. An open hole forward model does notproperly describe the cased hole environment. When inverting the forwardmodel to obtain the unknowns, this will result in a poor fit orreconstruction. Therefore a large reconstruction error would beindicative of the presence of casing.

In a second example, a model including the presence of drill pipe can beused. An example inversion can solve for a quantity related to thepresence or absence of drill pipe. An example of such a quantity is thethickness of steel surrounding the tool. The inversion of an OH forwardmodel may attempt to solve for tool standoff, mud weight and mud Pe(photoelectric effect). In the presence of casing, the inversion mayshow increased mud weight and mud Pe and therefore signal the presenceof casing. If the forward model includes a cased hole description, thenit will solve for casing thickness and the presence of casing will bedirectly indicated by the inversion.

Alternatively, a database and a neural network can be used to detect thepresence or absence of drill pipe. A neural network, which is properlyconfigured, will attempt to find the best match between a database ofknown situation (responses) and the observed response. If the databaseis limited to open hole, the neural network will indicate the lack of anacceptable solution. If a cased hole (including drill pipe)characterization is in the database the neural network will indicate thepresence of casing and/or drill pipe.

If the tool is used in a well known environment, additional input can beprovided by using local knowledge, which could allow for tighter limitson the measurements made by the tool to be imposed. Such inputs may bethe casing weight (typically given in lb/ft), mud weight, drill pipeinner and outer diameter to name a few. Other methods consistent withthis disclosure can be used, as may be recognized by one of ordinaryskill in the art having benefit of the present disclosure.

Additionally, in some embodiments, a neutron tool response can be usedto try and determine whether the tool is inside the carrier or deployed.In some embodiments, the neutron tool may provide three count rates onwhich the determination can be based. Other numbers of count rates arealso possible. In another embodiment, neutron tool information can beused to corroborate the results obtained from density. As with thedensity measurement, the count rates alone may not give sufficientinformation to allow a vote.

In some cases, e.g. Platform Express density, a resistivity measurementis collocated with the density measurement on the same pad. Theresistivity measurement may show very low resistivity in the presence ofdrill pipe or casing. This low reading may be used to determine whetherthe tool is inside drill pipe. In a different embodiment, there could bea simple dedicated resistivity measurement, e.g. one or more resistivitymeasurement buttons collocated with the density measurement or close toit, which are used for the detection of casing or drill pipe. Such ameasurement device could also be installed on the caliper arm.

Alternatively, it is possible to install an ultrasonic device on thedensity pad (or mandrel) collocated with the density measurement orwithin a short distance of it. The ultrasonic measurement is sensitiveto the presence of drill pipe or casing and the measurement may be usedto determine whether the tool is in drill pipe. Yet another collocatedmeasurements could be a dielectric measurement (Schlumberger DielectricScanner), which is very sensitive to the presence of drillpipe orcasing.

FIG. 9 is a diagram of a neutron tool 966, according to an exampleembodiment. In an example embodiment, the neutron tool 966 contains aneutron source 968 (e.g., an AmBe source 968, but the source 968 neednot be limited to the use of a radioisotope source). Additionally, theneutron tool 966 can include three neutron detectors. Two detectors canbe mounted side-by-side at a first axial spacing from the source 968.One of these detectors can be a detector of epithermal neutrons (e.g.,the near epithermal detector 970), the second detector (e.g., the nearthermal detector 972) can be a detector of thermal neutrons—includingepithermal ones. A third detector—the far detector 974, which can be athermal neutron detector, is at a farther axial spacing. Otherembodiments could include two or more thermal detectors at two or morespacings, two or more epithermal detectors on two or more spacings oranother combination such as those that may be recognized by one ofordinary skill in the art having benefit of the present disclosure. Theneutron tool 966 can further include a tool housing 976, as well asshielding 978 and backshielding 980.

As with the density measurement, in some embodiments, count rates mayneed to be calibrated to a reference calibration standard in order toaccount for variability in source 968 strength and tool-to-tool responsedifferences.

Like with the density tool 212 described above with reference to FIGS.2-8, in example embodiments, measurements of the neutron tool 966 insidedrill pipe is similar to the situation of the tool inside casing, andthus an estimate of a response of a neutron tool 966 being within adrill pipe can be obtained by looking at the neutron tool 966 responsein casing. An example of the effect of casing is shown in FIG. 10, whichis a graph plotting depth versus the count rates of the near detectors(thermal 972 and epi-thermal 970) and the far detector 974, according toan example embodiment. As the tool enters the casing (e.g., shown by theline at approximately 165 ft of depth), the thermal count rates 1082,1086 drop sharply. However, the low count rates are still in the rangeof the count rates that could be observed in open hole at high porosityand/or salinity. The count rates may therefore not give an unambiguousindication whether the tool is inside the casing (or inside thedeployment sleeve). The count rate 1084 of the epithermal detector 970shows virtually no change when entering the casing. This could be anindication that ratios of count rates could be used to detect thetransition from cased to open hole.

FIG. 11 is a graph plotting depth versus thermal neutron porosity (TNPH)1190 and thermal alpha factor (TALP) 1188, according to an exampleembodiment. This shows the thermal neutron porosity and the alpha factorthat is used in the enhanced resolution processing. The alpha factorrepresents the ratio between TNPH and the apparent near thermal detector972 porosity that is used to obtain an answer with a higher verticalresolution. The alpha factor represents therefore the discrepancybetween TNPH and the less accurate porosity that can be obtained fromthe near thermal detector 972 count rate. A drop in the alpha factorindicates that the near detector porosity differs more from the ratioporosity. As shown, the alpha factor can have low values in open hole.This can be overcome by deriving a more accurate single detectorporosity algorithm and/or by basing the alpha factor on a more complexfunction of the ratio porosity and the near thermal neutron porosity.

FIG. 12 is a graph plotting depth versus an exemplary Near/Far thermalcount rate ratio 1294 and also an exemplary (Near Thermal)/(Nearepithermal) count rate ratio 1292, according to an example embodiment.As shown, the ratio of the two near count rates in this example shows aclear indication as the tool enters casing. Accordingly, in someembodiments, the (Near Thermal)/(Near epithermal) count rate ratio canprobably be exploited as an indicator.

As stated repeatedly, the approaches to use neutron measurements for thedetection of whether the tool is outside casing are not exhausted by theabove examples. Some additional example possibilities include thefollowing. In some example embodiments, a deltaphi (i.e. the differencebetween the near and near/far thermal porosities) can be used as acasing indicator, which could be analogous to the use of deltaRho in thecase of density. Another example can be to use the relative change(e.g., difference, ratio or other functional form) of the apparentporosities derived from all three detector count rates as an indicator.In some example embodiments, such as where a tool has a pulsed neutronsource 968, epithermal slowing down time (SDT) or Sigma can be used asfurther indicators, as the near epithermal/thermal ratio can serve as anindication of Sigma. Moreover, with the density measurement, the abovesolutions can be used with neural networks. Additionally, using localknowledge, tighter limits can be imposed on the measurements.

Additionally, in some embodiments other types of measurements in thetool string can be used to determine whether the tool is deployed, suchas induction, phasor-induction, acoustic, nuclear magnetic resonanceand/or sonic measurements. In some embodiments, if the measurement madeis below the density tool 212, then the fact that the tool below hasbeen deployed may not be a certain indication that the tool above hasbeen deployed.

Again, other systems and methods consistent with this disclosure can beused, as may be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art havingbenefit of the present disclosure.

In example embodiments, based on the example results in the precedingsections, an algorithm can be used to indicate to the tool whether itshould be powered up, open the caliper arm 232 and start acquisition. Ifthe tool can detect by itself, whether it is outside of the drill pipe,the deployment can be made more efficient and the risk of damage to thetool or premature depletion of the battery will decrease.

The new algorithm can complement or supersede the approaches already inplace. One example implementation of such an algorithm is shown in FIG.13, which is a flow diagram of an auto-detect algorithm or methodaccording to an example embodiment. In certain embodiments, it may beassumed that a minimum amount of time needs to elapse before the toolwill try to detect whether it is ready for deployment. The time can beset when initializing the tool before lowering it into drill pipe.Alternatively, the timer could start once a certain pressure (orpossibly temperature) is reached. This may require a pressure(temperature) sensor and minimal electronics to be continuously enabled.

As shown in FIG. 13, in step 1305, a minimum amount of time has elapsed.After the predetermined time, in step 1310, the tool string (or at leasta predetermined tool in the string) will wake up and power up. In step1315, the tool waits for all the loops to stabilize so that reliablemeasurements can be made. As will be recognized by one of ordinary skillin the art having benefit of the present disclosure, steps can beperformed to ensure there has not been a hardware failure to preventadditional damage and/or wasted time waiting for all loops to stabilize.

In step 1320, the density measurement (and any others) are checked todetermine whether the tool (or at least the density or other appropriatesection) is outside the drill pipe. In step 1325, the method 1300determines whether the density section (or other appropriate section)has been deployed from the drill pipe. If the measurements indicate thatthe tool has been or is being deployed, the method 1300 branches to step1330, where it waits for a predetermined time (enough to allow fulldeployment to make sure that any downward movement due to the deploymenthas stopped). If the measurements indicate that the tool has not yetbeen deployed set a time for the next test and power down, the methodbranches to step 1335, where the measurement acquisition and power arestopped, then proceeds to step 1340 where time passes until returning tostep 1305.

Once the method 1300 reaches and completes step 1330 and the caliper isattempted to be opened, the method 1300 then determines in step 1345whether caliper was successfully opened. In other words, in an exampleembodiment, the method 1300 determines whether the caliper readingindicates that the tool is outside the drill pipe, as discussed above.

If the measurement indicates that the caliper could not open, the method1300 branches to step 1350, where the caliper is closed, and thenproceeds to step 1340. If, however, the measurement indicates that thecaliper could open, the method 1300 branches to step 1355, where thecaliper proceeds to make the measurement.

In another example embodiment, some or all of the foregoing techniquescan be used to create a test to determine whether the tool has beendeployed. However, in some embodiments, the detailed parameters for thevarious tests can only be defined after some modeling andexperimentation. Table 1, shown below, lists an example set of requiredexperiments and modeling, with conditions for density detector voteaccording to an exemplary embodiment. In some embodiments, the densitycheck needs to assure in multiple ways that the tool is deployed.Additionally, precautions may need to be taken to allow acquisition if asensor has failed.

In an example embodiment, the proposed approach is based on thefollowing conditions to allow opening the caliper: (1) there need to beat least two “yes” votes for opening the caliper; and (2) there is noveto. Additionally, in some embodiments, if the long-spaced hardwareshows a failure, the caliper may not be opened but acquisition can beenabled to make sure that the measurements continue. In some exampleembodiments, once the caliper has opened no further checks areperformed. Additionally, if the short-spaced hardware fails, a singlevote can be needed to open the caliper, since a usable answer can oftenbe obtained with the long-spaced density alone.

TABLE 1 Input for Barite (or Caliper Acq Measurement Conditions limitcalculation Cs-formate) vote vote Long-spaced detector All LS HW okStatus flags (TBD) n/a Abstain Abstain HW not ok Abstain LS PEF<PEF_(max), HW OK BS Yes or No Yes Yes >PEF_(max), HW OK No >PEF_(max),HW OK Yes Abstain Abstain LS Density HW OK n/a n/a Abstain AbstainShort-spaced detector All SS HW ok Status flags (TBD) n/a AbstainAbstain HW not ok Abstain Abstain SS PEF <PEF_(max), HW OK BS Yes or NoYes Yes >PEF_(max), HW OK No >PEF_(max), HW OK Yes Abstain Abstain SSDensity <ρ_(max) HW OK BS n/a Abstain Abstain >ρ_(max) HW OK n/aρ_(LS)-ρ_(SS) ρ_(LS)-ρ_(SS) >δρ_(min), HW OK BS n/a Yes Yes <δρ_(min),HW OK BS n/a

As to the example methods and steps described in the embodimentspresented previously, they are illustrative, and, in alternativeembodiments, certain steps can be performed in a different order, inparallel with one another, omitted entirely, and/or combined betweendifferent exemplary methods, and/or certain additional steps can beperformed, without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.Accordingly, such alternative embodiments are included in the inventiondescribed herein. For example, instead of basing the decision on thedensity measurement or the density measurement alone, the decision canbe made based on neutron measurements (see above) or other measurementsin the tool (sonic, resistivity) which are all sensitive to the presenceof the drill pipe surrounding the tool, including resistivitymeasurements, sonic measurements, NMR measurements, dedicated sensor ormagnet for pipe detection, a sensor on or near density pad, a sensor inother parts of the toolstring, and a sensor configured to detectlatching of the tool.

Additionally, although some of the disclosure specifically refers todrill pipe conveyance tools, as one of ordinary skill in the art mayrecognize with the benefit of the present disclosure, certain aspects ofthe foregoing disclosure could apply to tools and toolstrings used inwireline, logging-while-drilling and/or measuring-while-drillingapplications, or other methods of conveyance, in addition.

The invention can comprise a computer program that embodies thefunctions described herein and illustrated in the flow charts. However,it should be apparent that there could be many different ways ofimplementing the invention in computer or algorithmic programming, andthe invention should not be construed as limited to any one set ofprogram instructions. Further, a skilled programmer would be able towrite such a program to implement an embodiment of the disclosedinvention based on the flow charts and associated description in theapplication text. Therefore, disclosure of a particular set of programcode instructions is not considered necessary for an adequateunderstanding of how to make and use the invention.

The invention can be used with computer hardware and software thatperforms the methods and processing functions described above.Specifically, in describing the functions, methods, and/or steps thatcan be performed in accordance with the invention, any or all of thesesteps can be performed by using an automated or computerized process. Aswill be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the systems, methods,and procedures described herein can be embodied in a programmablecomputer, computer executable software, or digital circuitry. Thesoftware can be stored on computer readable media. For example, computerreadable media can include a floppy disk, RAM, ROM, hard disk, removablemedia, flash memory, memory stick, optical media, magneto-optical media,CD-ROM, etc. Digital circuitry can include integrated circuits, gatearrays, building block logic, field programmable gate arrays (FPGA),etc.

Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described abovein detail, the description is merely for purposes of illustration.Various modifications of, and equivalent steps corresponding to, thedisclosed aspects of the exemplary embodiments, in addition to thosedescribed above, can be made by those skilled in the art withoutdeparting from the spirit and scope of the invention defined in thefollowing claims, the scope of which is to be accorded the broadestinterpretation so as to encompass such modifications and equivalentstructures.

What is claimed is:
 1. A toolstring for carrying a tool deployed throughdrill pipe, comprising: a sensor for making a measurement, themeasurement giving an indication as to whether the tool has beendeployed below the drill pipe, the sensor being located on thetoolstring; wherein the toolstring is powered up for logging upon adetermination that the tool has been deployed below the drill pipe, thedetermination that the tool has been deployed below the drill pipe beingbased on the indication.
 2. The toolstring of claim 1, wherein themeasurement comprises a plurality of measurements made by the sensor,and wherein the sensor comprises a plurality of sensors.
 3. Thetoolstring of claim 1, wherein acquisition of log data is started basedon the determination that the tool has been deployed below the drillpipe.
 4. The toolstring of claim 1, wherein the toolstring is latched toa bottom of the drill pipe.
 5. The toolstring of claim 1, wherein themeasurement comprises at least one of: a gamma-gamma density andphotoelectric factor (PEF) measurement using one or more gamma-raydetectors.
 6. The toolstring of claim 5, wherein the measurementcomprises at least one of: calibrated count rates in one or more of thegamma-ray detectors compared to predetermined limits.
 7. The toolstringof claim 1, wherein the measurement comprises at least one of: anultrasonic measurement made by a device on a density pad on thetoolstring; a dielectric measurement; and a resistivity measurementsubstantially collocated with a density measurement.
 8. The toolstringof claim 1, wherein the measurement comprises at least one of: apparentgamma-gamma density compared to predetermined limits; a differencebetween apparent densities measured by two or more gamma-gamma densitydetectors; a spectral shape of a gamma-ray spectrum measured with one ormore detectors; count rates from multiple gamma ray detectors, whereinthe count rates are input into a forward model, and wherein theindication is based on a reconstruction error from the inversion of theforward model; and count rates from multiple detectors entered in aneural network that determine a presence or absence of drill pipe. 9.The toolstring of claim 1, wherein the measurement is based on a ratiobetween counts in a low energy spectral window and counts in a highenergy spectral window in a spectrum.
 10. The toolstring of claim 1,wherein the measurement comprises at least one of: a forward model andinversion of count rates from a plurality of energy windows of densitydetectors to obtain density and PEF; and a forward model of the countrates of the one or more gamma-ray detectors in one or more energywindows, where the forward model includes the response to drill pipearound the tool and inversion an inversion solving for the presence ofdrill pipe around the tool.
 11. The toolstring of claim 1, wherein themeasurement comprises a measurement made with a neutron porosity toolcontaining at least one thermal or epithermal detector.
 12. Thetoolstring of claim 11, wherein the measurement comprises calibratedcount rates of one or more detectors based on preset limits of the countrates.
 13. The toolstring of claim 11, wherein the measurement comprisesat least one of: a difference between an apparent porosity based on theratio of a count rate of a far neutron detector and a near neutrondetector and an apparent porosity based on the count rate of a nearthermal neutron detector; a difference between an apparent porositybased on a count rate of a far neutron detector and an apparent porositybased on the count rate of a near thermal neutron detector; a ratiobetween (a) an apparent porosity based on a count rate of a far neutrondetector, and (b) an apparent porosity based on the count rate of a nearthermal neutron detector; and a ratio between (a) an apparent porositybased on a count rate ratio of a far neutron detector and a near neutrondetector, and (b) an apparent porosity based on the count rate of a nearthermal neutron detector.
 14. The toolstring of claim 1, wherein acaliper attached to the toolstring is opened based on a positiveindication, and wherein if the caliper cannot open beyond apredetermined value, the caliper is subsequently closed.
 15. Thetoolstring of claim 14, wherein the measurement is repeated after apredetermined wait time to determine if the caliper can be opened. 16.The toolstring of claim 1, wherein the measurement comprises at leastone of: a resistivity measurement, an induction measurement, a galvanicresistivity measurement, a nuclear magnetic resonance measurement, asonic measurement, an ultrasonic measurement, and a measurement from amagnetic sensor.
 17. The toolstring of claim 1, wherein the toolcomprises a pulsed neutron porosity and spectroscopy tool, and whereinthe measurement comprises at least one of: neutron slowing down timemeasurements for at least one detector; a thermal neutron decay (sigma)measurement; and a gamma-spectroscopy of neutron-induced gamma-rays. 18.The toolstring of claim 1, wherein the one or more measurements yields avoting pattern, and wherein the power to the toolstring is enabled basedon the voting pattern.
 19. A method for determining whether a tool hasbeen deployed below a drill pipe, comprising: making at least onedownhole measurement with the tool; and determining whether the tool hasbeen deployed below the drill pipe based on the at least one downholemeasurement; wherein acquisition of log data is started based on thedetermination that the tool has been deployed below the drill pipe,wherein the measurement comprises at least one of: a gamma-gamma densityand photoelectric factor (PEF) measurement using one or more gamma-raydetectors, wherein a caliper attached to the toolstring is opened basedon a positive indication, wherein if the caliper cannot open beyond apredetermined value, the caliper is subsequently closed, and wherein themeasurement repeated after a predetermined wait time to determine if thecaliper can be opened.